10Y Yield 4.44% +2 bps
Fed Funds 3.64% 6M -69 bps
CPI YoY +2.66% 1M +0.27%
Unemployment 4.40% 3M -0.10 pp
Informational only. Not investment advice.
Macro rates restrictive, labor softening

Research workflow and filing intelligence for equity analysts

Equity Analyst AI is being built as an end-to-end workflow tool for equity analysts. The beta already covers watchlist monitoring, source-linked briefs, company context, and grounded follow-up. The broader vision is an agentic research workspace that can execute tasks end to end, from modelling and charts to report drafting, while staying grounded in evidence.

Currently in beta. I am working with a small group of analysts to refine the product. If you have been sent this link directly, I would genuinely value your feedback.

From filing to brief in minutes

Add tickers to your watchlist. When a company files with the SEC, you get an AI summary with source citations. No manual checking, no delay.

Your watchlist
Watchlist
Latest updates across your watchlist
Covered Entities
A-Z
Apple Inc. AAPL
2 unread Added recently
View profile Remove
NVIDIA CORP NVDA
No new filings Added recently
View profile Remove
Amazon.com, Inc. AMZN
1 unread High impact alert
View profile Remove
Microsoft Corp. MSFT
No new filings Monitoring
View profile Remove
Add Company
Start monitoring a ticker instantly.
Ticker or Name...
Add to watchlist
Once a new filing lands, the dashboard will populate with a source-linked brief automatically.
Email brief
Filing brief
← Back to dashboard
NVIDIA CORP (NVDA) - 10-K
Open the brief, scan the reading flow, and verify every claim.
Evidence map Open source
Brief
10-K Filed: 2026-03-14 Impact: High (88/100)
Executive Takeaway
NVIDIA's latest filing reinforces that AI infrastructure demand remains strong, with revenue growth and EPS momentum continuing to run well above most large-cap peers. E1 E4
What Happened
  • Revenue rose sharply year over year, led by continued demand across data-centre workloads. E2
  • Free cash flow and profitability both improved, supporting the current investment cycle. E5
Why It Matters
  • The filing keeps the core debate centered on sustainability of AI demand and margin durability rather than a near-term slowdown. E6
Risks / Uncertainties
  • Watch for customer concentration, supply tightness, and whether capex intensity normalizes over the next few quarters. E9
Ask AI in context
Follow-up in context
Ask AI
Turn the filing into the next piece of work without losing source context.
Prompt
Write a five-line PM update on why this financing matters, plus two watch points for next quarter.
Output
PM note draft
Citations Copy

The note issuance improves liquidity flexibility and gives Amazon more room to fund capex and strategic priorities across the next few years.

The key question is not access to capital, but how effectively management deploys that larger balance-sheet capacity into growth and returns.

Watch next quarter for commentary on investment cadence and for any change in funding mix or maturity strategy.

Source Executive takeaway Evidence What happened 1 Evidence What happened 2 Source Why it matters

What is being built now

The roadmap is being shaped by feedback from current beta users. These are the areas in active development. If any of these would be particularly useful to your workflow, I want to hear about it.

Coming soon
Research Studio
A dedicated workspace for structured research tasks. Ask for an output or select a task type and the agent produces it with source support.
  • Company one-pagers and full research reports (PDF, Note)
  • DCF workbooks and forecast skeletons (XLSX)
  • Peer comps and KPI trend charts
  • Targeted extraction from filings and exhibits
  • Earnings recap and guidance summaries
Research Studio Coming soon
Ask for charts, reports, models, and research outputs across your coverage universe.
Reports
PDF Note
Models
XLSX
Coming soon
Broader source coverage
Expanding beyond SEC filings to include more of the primary sources analysts actually use.
  • Earnings call transcripts
  • Earnings press releases and presentations
  • Company investor relations pages
  • UK equity coverage (initial list)
Coming soon
Richer chart and table outputs
Ask AI responses will produce more structured financial outputs, not just text.
  • KPI trend charts inline with ask answers
  • Comparative tables across companies or periods
  • Exportable data outputs from research queries

Current product surfaces

These are the real surfaces already in the product today: the dashboard, the briefs, and the company pages that keep follow-up work in context.

Dashboard

Inbox, overview, and macro context sit side by side in the product. The dashboard is built for quick triage rather than generic browsing.

Inbox
Dashboard inbox in light mode Dashboard inbox in dark mode
Overview
Dashboard overview in light mode Dashboard overview in dark mode
Macro
Dashboard macro context in light mode Dashboard macro context in dark mode

Filing briefs

Structured brief pages combine a readable summary with evidence-linked follow-up so the output remains inspectable instead of hand-wavy.

Brief
NVIDIA filing brief in light mode NVIDIA filing brief in dark mode

Company pages

Overview, financials, and risks all live in the same company context, so the next question or task starts from the right evidence base.

Overview
Company overview in light mode Company overview in dark mode
Financials
Company financials in light mode Company financials in dark mode
Risks
Company risks in light mode Company risks in dark mode

Follow-up questions are grounded in the actual filing

Generic AI tools produce confident answers with no traceable source. In equity research, that is a problem. Every Ask AI answer in this product includes evidence tags that link back to the specific paragraph in the original filing that was used to generate the response.

Deep mode expands context across a company's full filing history and KPI data. Standard mode is faster and grounded in the current brief.

Capability Equity Analyst AI Generic AI chat
Filing monitoring and alerts Yes, continuous No
Source-linked evidence Yes, paragraph-level No
Impact scoring and triage Yes No
KPI trend context Yes, from SEC XBRL Not reliably
Workflow around your coverage Yes You provide the context
Ask AI with source evidence on a brief
← Back to company
Apple Inc. (AAPL) - 10-Q
Ask AI stays grounded in the current brief and source-linked evidence.
Open source
10-Q Filed: 2026-01-30 Impact: High (75/100)
Executive Takeaway
The Company is currently facing multiple antitrust investigations and lawsuits, including a EUR500 million fine from the European Commission related to the EU Digital Markets Act. E1 E8
What Happened
  • On March 25, 2024, the European Commission opened a formal investigation into DMA compliance. E1
  • On March 21, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil antitrust lawsuit. E8
Why It Matters
  • The legal challenges could lead to significant financial penalties and operational changes. E1 E8
Ask AI
Clear Close

Question: What is the main risk here for next quarter?

The principal near-term risk is that legal and regulatory pressure forces product or operating changes that weaken monetisation or create further fines.

The current brief supports that conclusion with the DMA fine and the DOJ action, both of which point to continuing scrutiny rather than a one-off event.

SourceWhat happened 1 EvidenceEvidence E1 SourceWhy it matters 1

This is a beta product being shaped with feedback from analysts

The core monitoring and brief workflow is working. What I am trying to understand now is where it fits into real analyst workflows, what is missing, and what is worth building next.

If you have been sent this link, I would find your perspective genuinely useful. You do not need to be polished about it. Rough feedback on what is confusing, missing, or not quite right is more valuable than polished praise.

  • 01Does the monitoring and brief workflow fit how you actually triage filings today?
  • 02Which sources are missing that would make this genuinely useful to your day-to-day?
  • 03What would Research Studio need to produce to be worth using over your current process?
  • 04Is there anything in the product that feels off, confusing, or simply wrong?